changes. changes. changes.
sometimes you do a lot of hard work researching a line and adding all the little details... but sometimes you dont have that one thing. that one little bit of info that makes everything you do fall apart.
i have to make a note here for changes to the family tree because dna results for the hancock family say now that the father of my ancestor benjamin hancock may not be john who married jane holt. some of you out there may be working on this line and need this tip. dna does not lie and it looks like the descendants of ben are not the same as the descendants of john and jane holt hancock. the hancock dna results page says they are in two different groups.
link below. however, after a closer look i find these results inconclusive so they may be proven wrong later. in short, further testing is needed.
hope this helps anyone out there who may need to make the necessary changes. will be having to do some major surgery on my trees in the coming weeks and sad to say good bye to the lines that will be lost in the process, but hey we are still cousins somehow, so i will not be deleting the folks in those lines just making changes to the pedigree view.
best of luck to you in your hunt and keep climbing those trees
and seeking those answers.
peace.
hancock ydna results page at ftdna...
https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Hancock?iframe=yresults
sometimes you do a lot of hard work researching a line and adding all the little details... but sometimes you dont have that one thing. that one little bit of info that makes everything you do fall apart.
i have to make a note here for changes to the family tree because dna results for the hancock family say now that the father of my ancestor benjamin hancock may not be john who married jane holt. some of you out there may be working on this line and need this tip. dna does not lie and it looks like the descendants of ben are not the same as the descendants of john and jane holt hancock. the hancock dna results page says they are in two different groups.
link below. however, after a closer look i find these results inconclusive so they may be proven wrong later. in short, further testing is needed.
hope this helps anyone out there who may need to make the necessary changes. will be having to do some major surgery on my trees in the coming weeks and sad to say good bye to the lines that will be lost in the process, but hey we are still cousins somehow, so i will not be deleting the folks in those lines just making changes to the pedigree view.
best of luck to you in your hunt and keep climbing those trees
and seeking those answers.
peace.
hancock ydna results page at ftdna...
https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Hancock?iframe=yresults
